In some companies, a typical working week has been reduced to 30 hours. Do the advantages outweigh the demerits?
The idea of working hours reduced is the most valued as can reduce stress. Although this might be acceptable, this gives more opportunities for workers to be close with their family, surpassing any demerits.
It is true that when a new working program of 30 hours is applied is would be the one main of advantages for workers since they are being away from burnout. Despite the fact that seems good, the cut in work hours may impact the companies which cannot achieve target due to working time reduction, but this is not totally true, since workers spend more time from the office nurtures their minds be more creative to find new ideas accomplishing such big project postponed. For example, In Indonesia, some companies working in the television industry have adjusted a 30-hour workweek to office employees to develop better mental issues and give them more chances to create new ideas for the project, so they have opportunities to be hired by the users.
Another positive impact from that idea is having more time with family, building strong bond relationships. In spite of that might be reasonable, reducing work time of 30 hours per week is tend to bring down personal income. However, having strong bond relationships with family tends to increase happiness, making them more united to overcome any problems they face, avoiding various misunderstandings. According to BBC News, 70% of people in England who successfully managed their family until old age and still live together is because they often doing the holiday with their family every year so rarely did they fight.
On the whole, it is reasonable that many people are might be less of stress because the typical working week is reduced to 30 hours. Furthermore, often meeting the family is also an opportunity that can be obtained even though there are still have a small negative impact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-02 | bgs.id | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-07 | nur pitriyah etika | 71 | view |
| 2022-02-07 | nur pitriyah etika | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-08 | tegarangkasa | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-08 | naufalrahman96 | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the estimated literacy rates by region and gender for 2000 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...ucing work time of 30 hours per week is tend to bring down personal income. However,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...be obtained even though there are still have a small negative impact.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, may, so, still, as for, for example, in spite of, it is true, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98076923077 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60359806416 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.427736835 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.272727273 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3636363636 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209883087605 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924700857985 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886973176877 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126067178719 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029912269085 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.