Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

In this day and age, the elderly regardless of age could go on working if they want has been gaining the public's attention and become popular in some nations. However, every coin has its two sides and this issue is not an exception. In my opinion, i hold a belief that this emerging trend is more harmful than good.
There are several reasons why the old people are allowed to work in any age, which brings about effects for society. Firstly, it is noticeable that the older labors could lead to the development of unemployment rate. This means that the juvenile having relevant qualifications and being willing to work longer hours are likely to be paid a low salary, while the old citizens are formidable candidates because they are rich experience and profession. Therefore, the old people are able to achieve the work's requirements without any effort, and similarly the young labors are more and more increasing, this results in a unnecessary redundancy. Secondly, the unbalance in labor market is also a substantial problem stemming from the existence of the old workforce. This is due to an explanation that the elderly are not able to do manual jobs, which require good heath. As a result, office work is more suitable for the older people, such as business environment, making it unreasonable attractions, when some jobs contain in difficult environment, such as nursery, engineering, and so on, which are more unpopular in public. As a consequence, this brings about the potential shortage of labor in some field.
Nevertheless, the rate of old people in some countries rises too fast, such as the old population in Japan or some Europe nations. If the governments do not have methods to support the elderly's life, they will face to many difficulties about costs of living. Therefore, allowing the old citizens working is a humanitarian measure.
In conclusion, population in the world is increasing that the old labors going on working are likely to lead to inevitable impacts in public. As a result, i think that the aforementioned demerits totally outweigh benefits.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-20 MEBC Class 80 view
2024-06-07 my220904 67 view
2024-06-06 tata 73 view
2024-06-06 tata 73 view
2024-06-06 tata 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...rking if they want has been gaining the publics attention and become popular in some na...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...sue is not an exception. In my opinion, i hold a belief that this emerging trend ...
^
Line 2, column 616, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...re and more increasing, this results in a unnecessary redundancy. Secondly, the u...
^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...vitable impacts in public. As a result, i think that the aforementioned demerits ...
^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned demerits totally outweigh benefits.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88786403003 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553314121037 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8696343036 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321960161782 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929557391659 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826237175255 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183140729282 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07310883727 0.056905535591 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...rking if they want has been gaining the publics attention and become popular in some na...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...sue is not an exception. In my opinion, i hold a belief that this emerging trend ...
^
Line 2, column 616, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...re and more increasing, this results in a unnecessary redundancy. Secondly, the u...
^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...vitable impacts in public. As a result, i think that the aforementioned demerits ...
^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned demerits totally outweigh benefits.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88786403003 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553314121037 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8696343036 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321960161782 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929557391659 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826237175255 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183140729282 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07310883727 0.056905535591 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.