In some countries, it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, many countries are making legislation to protect employers rights such as prohibiting employers from rejecting candidates based on their age. I believe this is a positive development.
There are several reasons why employers might feel like this is not the right direction. The main one is, older people might not be suitable for some work fields where they need to do heavy physical work most of the time. Therefore, employers would want to know applicants ages to have better grips of their capacity. For example, a worker in the construction industry would need to be fit, able to carry heavy materials and be active all day long.
However, it would be better to have a general rule that forbids the rejection of people because of their age. Although some jobs can be done better by young people, many employers simply reject candidates unfairly. For instance, they might be concerned about the image of the company and think a younger person would make them appear good so, they would choose a younger person even though an old applicant has better qualifications. Also, older people, especially in some particular fields such as law or accountancy, many skills since they work in this area for a long time. Their experiences would bring so much to the company that a younger person might not be capable of. Therefore, it is beneficial to put rules to prevent the rejection of older people.
In conclusion, some countries are making rules to prevent age discrimination at workplaces which is a positive development that gives all people equal chances to earn their living. I believe, many countries would adopt this rule in the future.
- Although more and more people read the news on the internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is certainly difficult for people in cities to do physical exercise Why is this the case What can be done to solve this problem 61
- The only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say students should be given more homework Others say that children should be free to enjoy their youth Discuss both views and give your opinion 69
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96750902527 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68313877139 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56678700361 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9215302227 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2857142857 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183701781596 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700865481102 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401726128172 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123591833843 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282069479523 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96750902527 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68313877139 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56678700361 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9215302227 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2857142857 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183701781596 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700865481102 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401726128172 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123591833843 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282069479523 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.