In some countries an increasing numbers of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent fo you agree or disagree?
In the present time, there are some nations in which a huge number of humans are facing some health related issues which is due to eating unhealthy food such as fast food. As it is necessary for higher authorities to put a higher taxes on fast food by which people stop eating food. I completely agree with this statement, I will discuss my views in the upcoming pargraphs.
To begin with, eating unhelathy food can cause uncountable problems related to health. Fast food cause health problems, the main reason behind this is that they are oily substance which do not easily digest. To elaborate, the outsider food is cooked by using huge quantity oilf in which food become delicious. The major issue is that it is not digesting easily, remaining in a body for more than two days which cause stomach problems like, stomach pain, difficulty in breathing and many more. Secondly, it effects on the body posture. To clarify, after eating fast they make body fat by which people are facing numerous problems. However, it is extremely difficult for an individual to walk, due to which a person can come in contact of diseases. Therefore, eating unhelathy food is not beneficial for heath.
Apart from this, there are unprecedened ways by which people can stop eating street food. The pioneer one is law maker should impose a higher taxes on street food. To elucidate, after putting huge tax, the prices of food will increase by which people stop eating fast food and easily switch to homemade food. Hence, it is a responsibility of higher authorities to aware people about diets.
In conclusion, eating fast food is not beneficial to the health, so individual should quickly shift to home food which help to keep them safe from diseases and live long.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81395348837 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46384435849 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518272425249 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4635908148 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5625 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354437573701 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131789454562 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842032811628 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245124974855 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068311180274 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81395348837 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46384435849 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518272425249 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4635908148 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5625 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354437573701 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131789454562 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842032811628 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245124974855 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068311180274 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.