in some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. why might this be the case? do you think is a positive or negative situation?
Some citizens believe that homeownership is essential in their life, while renting a home have its drawback. This is to say, owning a home brings a sense of stability and it has a positive impact.
It is understandable to believe that owning a home rather than renting a home provide more stability in one's life. People would concentrate on their life plans since they might not have to pay for a relocation or a rental. For instance, the youngster who owning a beautiful house, they can start to form a family, a home can serve as a heaven for children and adults alike. Moreover, without thinking about cost for home rental, a family can make an education plan for their children. As a consequence, people who own a home are more successful and happier.
Moving ahead, the reason why owning a property has a positive development than renting a house because it provides a chance for investment. Subsequently, the overall cost of house selling price slightly increasing year by year. As the demand for homes rises, so does the price. In a case, the average price of a house in Jakarta currently starts at 500 million rupiah, which is higher than last year's price of 300 million rupiah. For this reason, it is a terrific chance for young adults to own a home and maybe start a business in real estate.
To sum up, there a great experience if individuals wish to own a house rather to rent one since they would have more stability in their lives. However, residents should never buy a house than they can afford as it is has consequences
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-26 | mardanpour | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-28 | jade2812 | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | fatimatuzzahro | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | fatimatuzzahro | 71 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | Trandonghung | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of self employed workers of the total workforce in five countries in 1998 and 2008 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Percentage participation of men in Senior development position 91
- Cases of whooping cough Britain 1940 1990 87
- It has been proposed that citizens should only consume food and drink products that have been produced in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people why might this be the case do you think is a positive or negative situation 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...enting a home provide more stability in ones life. People would concentrate on their...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6496350365 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66077167341 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551094890511 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0140711816 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303284825819 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110051889385 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614047099572 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173095634251 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500868754893 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.