In some countries police officers do not carry guns. How does this affect the manner they implement law and order? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a gun. Provide specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
There is no doubt that to maintain law and order in any nation police department plays a crucial role in it. While, there are various advantages of keeping ammunition, we should also consider the disadvantages of possessing those. In this essay, we will discuss both benefits and drawbacks of having a gun, giving relevant examples wherever necessary.
Firstly, one of the main advantages of possessing ammunition by police personals are self- protection. This is because, a mob can lose their emotional control, which may lead to an aggressive action against these officers. For example, in my own experience, being a reporter I witnessed a bad conflict between government officers and a crowd, which ended in a massive bloodshed for purpose of self- defense. In contrast, arms in possession of any corrupt officer can be misused against an innocent person. As a result, people began to lose trust in the government thus leading to an unsettled nation.
On the other hand, one of the important disadvantages of acquiring a gun is misusing it whenever desired. The reason is, the corruption and mental instability in any person, which creates a pseudo- sense of supreme power and control on anyone’s life. For instance, according to a report published in the New York Times in 2017, a police officer who suffered from mental illness called Schizophrenia, killed all his family members with his official ammunition because he suspected them to be aliens. As a consequence, this inhuman incident highlighted many possibilities that should be considered by any administration before permitting a license for gun. Therefore, it depends on a person’s intellectual development and personality to behave appropriately while possessing ammunition.
In conclusion, while the most relevant advantage of possessing a gun is for self-defence, the disadvantage of misusing it should also be considered by the authorities.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34437086093 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19571250204 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62582781457 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5528126305 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15561858683 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545135411879 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449600577427 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10625610448 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051155980391 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34437086093 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19571250204 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62582781457 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5528126305 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15561858683 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545135411879 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449600577427 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10625610448 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051155980391 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.