Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors in major sports competitions such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup. Others say it is better to spend money encouraging children to take up sports at a young age. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The trend towards allocating resources for professional athletes in many countries has sparked conflicting opinions. While this is beneficial to national reputation, I completely agree that it should be better spent for the youth generation for some reasons.
On the one hand, it is reasonable to invest heavily in ambitious and prospective sports competitors for participating in international tournaments. Considering the costs of hiring foreign trainers and health care specialists, it requires a sufficient government budget to cover all aspects and areas of sports. This is deemed an intrinsic motivation for sportsmen, given the best conditions to nurture talents and high-quality equipment to practice sporting activities. Those who are well-taken care by the state could be offered more opportunities to hold the championship and bring glory for the nation. Additionally, players who reach the pinnacle of sport could reinforce the reputation of a country by upholding their ranking in the global sports chart.
On the other hand, it is more justified for the governmental bodies to draw the attention on incentivizing sporting pursuit among the youth. Once the provision of sports facilities is executed, it would directly raise public health awareness and enable youngsters to adopt a fitness regime, which is essential to one’s physique development. Furthermore, teaching programmes sponsored by the council in which sports are integrated will enhance students' physical health, establishing an ideal balance between school schedule and outdoor activities, also freeing them from the daily academic pressure. As a result, youngsters’ strengthened physical well-being will contribute to a solid society structure since they play an integral part in national productivity and future social progress.
To conclude, the investment in professional sportsmen is essential. Nonetheless, the youths’ sporting spirit should be held in higher esteem, requiring additional attention in order to ensure their holistic development.
- Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors in major sports competitions such as the Olympic Games and football World Cup etc Others say it is better to spend money encouraging children to take up sports at a young age To what extent do you 84
- Parents should take courses in parenting in order to improve the lives of their children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to four London museums 73
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... to practice sporting activities. Those who are well-taken care by the state could be o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, then, well, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86577181208 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2160538813 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667785234899 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.935344263 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.461538462 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981072512898 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034899853621 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309502308568 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550154536425 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189967799596 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.