Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. What are the advantages and disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. What are the advantages and disadvantages?

Nowadays, laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants have been passed by some countries. There are some possible advantages and disadvantages from imposing such rules that I will explain below.
Regarding the benefits, first is lessening the cleanliness issue in public buildings. This is because of fewer number of tobacco ashes produce by the smokers. When some wastes such as tobacco ashes have been disappeared, the buildings will become a comfortable place for everybody. Furthermore, the restriction of smoking tobacco in public places can increase the level of public health because of some decreases on the air pollution. So that, people are able to enjoy the fresh air.
Moving the drawbacks, first, it is plain that smoking in public buildings will pose some economic tremors. This policy will affect a chaos in tobacco market. The reason is inclining number of tobacco consumption. Finally, another impact is profit loss in public places. As the major population in some countries like Indonesia, smokers feel uncomfortable to visit such places with smoking restriction. For example, in some countries, restaurant which provides a smoking area becomes the favorite destination than that without smoking area.
In conclusion, the positive sides of passing some laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings are lessening the cleanliness issue in public buildings and increasing the level of public health. Meanwhile, some drawbacks such as economic tremor and profit loss in some public places should not be forgotten as well.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-02-25 fsc19 56 view
2018-05-07 jackpages 67 view
2018-02-03 Ahmad1103 66 view
Essays by user fsc19 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, regarding, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45306122449 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77157584292 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6973220563 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461369953088 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146474916996 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133081025965 0.0667982634062 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324733479497 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122001450126 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.