In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.
It is quite common these days for young people in many countries to have a break from studying after graduating from high school. The trend is not restricted to rich students who have the money to travel, but is also evident among poorer students who choose to work and become economically independent for a period of time.
On the one hand, the reasons for this trend may involve various favour which can be resulted in. firstly, poor youngsters who decide to look for a job can get an opportunity to earn money for their saving. That saving can be beneficial to fund their tuition fees at higher educational level. Secondly, a young generation who travels to another area or even country will have a broader view of life and better personality. This can be a real merit to cope with the challenges of student’s life. Endergoing that, thus, is pondered as a favour for them in which they can reap some benefits.
On the other hand, there are certainly pitfalls in taking time off at that age. Young adults may end up never returning to their studies or finding it difficult to readapt to an academic environment. They may assume it is better to continue in a particular job, or to do something completely different from a university course. However overall, this is less likely today, when a set of academic qualifications are essential for getting a reasonable career. Hence, taking a gap year for working or travelling is still favourable.
In conclusion, conducting that kind of activities is highly recommended due to the benefits outweight the drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d become economically independent for a period of time. On the one hand, the reasons for thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84328358209 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79351794009 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638059701493 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8260425283 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7142857143 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238450667749 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070486397037 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705489375526 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126749712408 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665884307255 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.