Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of each system? Which is better?
Education for teenagers has always been a topical issue throughout our history as the information they have absorbed during their formative years is going to shape their identities and hence roles in a given society. To approach this issue, there two lines of thinking: orientating students towards the subjects that are of great use for their chosen path and introducing students to a variety of subjects before graduation. This essay attempts to point out the advantages of each system and conclude with a personal statement about which one is advantageous.
To begin with, a broad-based system offers students a solid grounding in many important subjects, such civics or arts. By participating in this education system, a 15-year-old student could map out their strengths and weakness, which is critically essential for the development of their self-awareness. In combination with the help of teachers and families, students could use such understanding to set out achievable goals and consequently, create their own niches as adult. Secondly, this educating method allows teenage learners to try their hands at different areas before decidedly channeling their attention and efforts into a particular discipline in higher education. In fact, this practice of learning and teaching is of great help to ill-informed students who wish to realize what area of study is well-suited to them.
On the other hand, a preference-based system focuses on identifying a student’s qualities or potentials and then through consultation between students and career experts, produces a list of jobs relevant to a student’s capabilities. Based on this knowledge, students are able to make a sound decision for their future occupations. This educational approach has proved effective in terms of time-efficiency and career development as students can start to devote their energies into fulfilling their dream jobs in their prime. Secondly, this unidimensional system creates a continuity of academic growth from grade school to university, ultimately resulting in a sophisticated command of a certain discipline. Students of such system are very likely to excel at universities and graduate with a practical understanding and skills that match the labor market’s demands. Studies have shown that most of the countries opting for this system can produce competent workforce because of its advantages over the other one.
In conclusion, both educating orientations have their own merits but from an economic perspective, students from the latter generally outperform the others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | phamnhung | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Rahat | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | phuongnguyen1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | xuananhle | 84 | view |
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Today people are wasting large amounts of food Why What can be done to reduce the amount of food wasted 95
- Museums and art galleries should focus on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts of the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- Only government action can solve housing shortages in big cities to what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 913, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es have shown that most of the countries opting for this system can produce comp...
^^
Line 5, column 949, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries opting for this system can produce competent workforce because of its advan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58163265306 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18124825865 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.4786695664 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.866666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1333333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256187339993 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090216465362 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441697467985 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149470742449 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576018122535 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.