Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some, but may also have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there any better approaches to encourage employees to work hard?
In high times of unemployment, employees appear to be doing very little to encourage their staff to work hard, but when job vacancies are scarce, they have to find effective ways of rewarding their staff in order to stop them from leaving the company.
One tangible way of doing this is to offer extra money to employees who are seen to be working exceptionally hard, and this is done in companies with a product to sell. For instance, real estate agents and department stores can offers a simple commission on all sales.
This style of management favours people who can demonstrate their contribution through sale figures, but does not take into account the work done by people behind the scenes who have little contact with the public. A better tactic is for management to offer a bonus to all the staff at the end of the year if the profits are healthy. This, however, does not allow management to target individuals who have genuinely worked harder than others.
Another pragmatic approach is to accredit excellent staff through incentive schemes such as 'Employee of the year' or 'worker of the month' to make people feel recognised. Such people usually singled out with the help of clients. Hotels, restaurants and tour operators may also allow their employees to accept tips offered by clients who are pleased with the service. However, tipping is a highly unreliable source of money and does not favour everyone.
In conclusion, Individuals want to be recognised for their contribution--whether through receiving more money or simply some encouraging words. They also need to feel that their contribution to the whole organisation is worthwhile, and therefore, good management should recognise this need and response appropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | quytnee | 74 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | Fedya | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | sheep | 80 | view |
- It is important for government to spend public funds on promoting a healthy lifestyle than treatment of people who are already ill Do you agree or disagree 78
- In some parts of the world traditional festivals and celebrations have disappeared or are disappearing What problems is this causing What measures could be taken to counter this situation 65
- It is important for government to spend public funds on promoting a healthy lifestyle than treatment of people who are already ill Do you agree or disagree 78
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults Agree or disagree 84
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... This style of management favours people who can demonstrate their contribution ...
^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who can demonstrate their contribution through sale figures, but does not take ...
^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...actic is for management to offer a bonus to all the staff at the end of the year ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11228070175 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89220303779 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0127736179 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.416666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271212253771 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882301493494 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475558209858 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141336506417 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486890459208 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.