Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all time, even on holidays, Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages.
Few employers feel that people working under them should be available to discuss business every time, irrespective of their working hours. However, this attitude of employers outweighs the disadvantages over advantages. Issues and benefits of this will be addressed in this essay.
People as students dedicate most of their time studying hard with an expectation of a better future: Having an enjoyable life by spending their earnings. Hence, robbing every moment of an employee, by the company is nowhere logical. This idea of employers, have many disadvantages to offer to the society.
Firstly, working continuously leads to exhaustion and creates tension. Workers might not be able to process their thoughts efficiently and bring out best ideas when called in the middle of something. Therefore, it is wastage of resources and time of both employee as well as employer. Secondly, disturbances in personal life won’t be welcomed by most employees unless they are workaholic, thereby forcing them to quit job and look for better opportunities that will help them to keep up balance between personal and professional life. Thirdly, it is bane for the employer too. Relying on one person completely indicates inefficiency of the boss and other staff to carry-out the duty. This might instil sense of pride in the employee’s brain, making him arrogant towards colleagues. Finally, an employer does not and cannot buy entire time of their workers thus, depriving them of social status. A case in point, a person attending a family function won’t be hailed if he is on phone throughout the function but will be trolled for not being social, ultimately ruining their personal relations.
In contrast to this, it might be necessary sometimes to take opinion of the worker and hence a call, once in a while is acceptable, especially, if the employee is senior most person in the department. Otherwise, disadvantages are higher than the advantages.
To summarize, employers should not deprive their employees of the quality time they deserve spending on themselves and work should not be carried beyond working hours.
- Organised tours to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for people and environment. 89
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 73
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 78
- many people spend a lot of money on clothes haircut and beauty products to enhance outer appearance Some people think that is good way to spend money while others think that there is better way to spend it Discuss both and give your opinion 84
- Some people think traveling abroadis a valuable experience for young people. Others think it wastes too much time and expense. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'out the best'.
Suggestion: out the best
...ss their thoughts efficiently and bring out best ideas when called in the middle of some...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 265, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... of resources and time of both employee as well as employer. Secondly, disturbances in per...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 93, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to spend'.
Suggestion: to spend
...loyees of the quality time they deserve spending on themselves and work should not be ca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33923303835 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91429006022 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587020648968 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1264570822 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05555555556 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214361173033 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659693186899 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391582032274 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118604083035 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354241950536 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.