Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Living in the world that people are working together no matter how the distance between them is. Every single person use the same languages which are used by many people such as English, French, Mandarin and so on. Because of those foreign languages’ needs, people are considering that children should learn once from elementary school for better results. Meanwhile, others claim that children should not learn a second language at the early school for many negative reasons. From my point of view, I strongly believe that children at the first year of school should acquaint a foreign language.
Firstly, young age children are the fastest learner. They can listen and remember faster than people from others. Through the researches which young children usually duplicate matter that adults teach them. For example, teachers or instructors help them with pronunciation and reading skills and children would remember and practice with adaptive accuracy. Secondly, primary students do not have much scientific subjects to learn, there are just uncomplicated math and physics. Beside that, extra curriculum and sports are their compulsory subjects. The most important subject that children have to learn is their mother language because they need to speak and read the documents when they grow up. Parallel with these subjects, a foreign language is needed because the main thing they learn is language so that another language is easy for them to avoid being not shy and train them archive various results in their mind's growth. A U.S style study that second language can help children have better confidence, memory and intelligence.
On the other hand, there are some negative sides of learning a second language that should be in the front. Some first language like Japanese, Mandarin or French are difficult languages and another once parallel with those will stress our kids out due to the knowledge they need to archive would be large. Moreover, learning new matter will waste their play-time and it make them lead to the growing with no childhood because they prefer explore the life to learn a new language in classes and it is no-doubt that any children do not like to go to school on much of their time.
In conclusion, a foreign language needs to be taught from primary school. Though of some bad perspectives that would be brought, the major advantages will help children in developing their mind with learning in right way and base knowledge from another language.
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In order for the world to be a greener place punishments and fines for environmentally unfriendly acts committed by individuals need to be more severe 84
- Write about the fossil fuels and their alternatives 84
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 935, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...ious results in their minds growth. A U.S style study that second language can he...
^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...atter will waste their play-time and it make them lead to the growing with no childh...
^^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...foreign language needs to be taught from primary school. Though of some bad persp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11330049261 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4545419412 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527093596059 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4858720355 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.263157895 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3684210526 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29399630392 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963910179069 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738698468931 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191016113304 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449829379524 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.