Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?

With advancement of gobalization, every aspect of learning language has altered. While some proponents argue that children should study a foreign language at primary school, I believe that it could bring negative repercussions in the future.

To begin with, it is undeniable that learning foreign languages at younger age can provide a variety of merits. Most of all, children with great language skills are likely to have more likelihood when it comes to workforce since a number of companies tend to look for applicants who are good at foreign languages. according to recent research, 7 out of 10 global corporations in Canada insist that employees' language skills contribute to development of their business. Furthermore, children might broaden their horizons because acquiring other languages helps them learn other country's culture.

However, it is universally accepted that studying a foreign language at primary school present various demerits. First of all, children's health status will decrease as they have a great deal of stress from studying. For example, the majority of parents who have kids at primary school in South Korea have a tendency to let them study other country's language until late at night, which triggers that children obtain much emotional destruction. Because of this, children may suffer from diverse simple diseases such as headaches and stomachaches. Moreover, society would gain higher suicide rates of children, especially among such students with serious distress according to some studies associated with social science.

In conclusion, although learning a foreign language in young age will create a diversity of benefits, I contend that this trend can bring more drawbacks including health problems in the future.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-25 mjm1 67 view
2020-01-13 Molor-Od 78 view
2019-12-22 rahulsd 73 view
2019-12-11 Gre user 56 view
2019-12-03 morbymuku 73 view
Essays by user geunzz :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g negative repercussions in the future. To begin with, it is undeniable that lea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...ants who are good at foreign languages. according to recent research, 7 out of 10 global ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...obal corporations in Canada insist that employees language skills contribute to developme...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, look, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52592592593 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77115259307 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4837673265 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308459874412 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113785607093 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764717078412 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190180579774 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661032353214 0.056905535591 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.