Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary schools. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
It is claimed that children are able to absorb a foreign language more effectively during their primary school time rather than in a secondary school environment. From my perspective, the enormous benefits brought by this belief surpass its drawbacks.
I strongly contend that the repercussions created by this trend should be in need of consideration since it might implicate the necessary ability of being fluent in at least one language. To specify, children may face the chaos of vocabulary when learn two languages simultaneously with a shortage of experience in managing study schedules. In light of this, utilizing such one specific language in communication is a potential challenge to them; moreover, in some serious cases, this tendency can bring huge distractions to one’s mother tongue. To add credence to my assertion, being playful and fun oriented can be considered as a tough limitation to educate the youngsters as they seem not to deliver much attention. Therefore, this could be perceived as a waste of time.
On the contrary, the advantages of this issue wholly overshadow its demerits. To explain this, the young generation has such decent intimacy skills associated with adaptation as they still have not been exposed to reality yet and are in the condition of imitating surrounding people effortlessly. Therefore, offspring would be able to immerse themselves in the foreign environment better which can boost the study process’s productivity. On top of that, concerning long-term results, children would be capable of fluently utilizing two languages.
In conclusion, the deficiency of concentration as well as language distractions are key driving factors for a foreign language study at an early age. However, I believe the benefits this trend offers are way more significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-20 | thuiinh | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | hoanghihi1234 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | leenguyn | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | hoanghihi1234 | 84 | view |
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss the two views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers any more To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 84
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tilizing two languages. In conclusion, the deficiency of concentration as well ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, well, at least, in conclusion, as well as, on the contrary, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40282685512 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12761371673 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639575971731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9356247613 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.615384615 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256948139833 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783995708869 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823797355038 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157023812365 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793123132069 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.