Some feel that movies and tv shows are a good way to study history despite their lack of historical accuracy at times.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often believed that the study of history with the aid of television or film is right choice even they don't have an exact declaration. I disagree with the statement because unauthenticated information about ancestry may have a conflict and bad image to the generations.
Historical channels and cinema might emerge from someone's imagination or assertions without proof or evidence. Such an exhibition would create discrimination and controversy among the citizen. Furthermore, unethical explanations or picturization of history may mitigate the ancestor's or historians' real-time effort and hard work for the people and the nation. For instance, some real incidents of freedom fighters' life experiences are made just opposite after the cinematography. In addition, special curriculum and history periods must need to cover the exact written material may give more insight to the students from an early age onwards. For example, pictures, chart makings, historical wars, and traditional culture if society can also include them in the curriculum would also help history studies.
Nevertheless, there are some benefits with the shows and creators of the movie for the upcoming generations to visualize the old scenario or situations. There are some best thrilling movies and series that exhibit some thread to the children. However, they must follow the rules and check the details are sincere. Moreover, there are many alternatives to explore history including writings of real chroniclers, monuments, and autobiographies of historians would be more beneficial than the artificial or scripted visual stories of history.
Television and flick would have more influence on people to explain history. Whereas the inaccurate narration would be harmful to the spectators, therefore real stories or living examples would be better great.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ision or film is right choice even they dont have an exact declaration. I disagree w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63309352518 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04714266356 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629496402878 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4709143219 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111538569933 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361434438826 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337092646193 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596051667146 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385469996626 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.