Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Numerous companies ensure that employees wear formal clothings, while others disregard appearances, focusing only on work output. In my opinion, I believe that although some companies enforce formal dress codes to seem attractive to investors and customers, they indirectly stifle free thinking and innovation from employees. Companies without dress codes promotes the later.
It is well known within business circles that customers are more trusting of an organisation where the employees look professional and smart. Customers would patronize such businesses due to the confidence it induces. In addition, angel investors would not hesitate to pour their funds into companies that have displayed professionalism along with a formal work attire. For example, law firms, banks and insurance companies heavily enforce said rules to boost the image and attractiveness of their organisations. While dress codes aren't the only indicator of work quality, it contributes to the companies outlook.
In contrast, enterprises without rules on work attire, tend to create an environment where employees can think and speak freely. Such companies promote openmindedness and innovation, focusing only on the result of work. Furthermore, it prevents a stressful or toxic work environment that could occur due to certain unforseen circumstances such as a bad hair or laundry day. The unlucky candidate could be suspended or worse, fired.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that although all companies should advocate for proper work etiquette within the work place, rules pertaining to work clothes could be more disadvantageous to the company. I recommend conpanies to be flexible in the enforcement of such rules.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 67
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 61
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... their organisations. While dress codes arent the only indicator of work quality, it ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
... of work quality, it contributes to the companies outlook. In contrast, enterprises wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63565891473 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07052101 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608527131783 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0360261406 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160946601664 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510812547416 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036918124267 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980239062867 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263429986177 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... their organisations. While dress codes arent the only indicator of work quality, it ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
... of work quality, it contributes to the companies outlook. In contrast, enterprises wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63565891473 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07052101 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608527131783 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0360261406 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160946601664 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510812547416 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036918124267 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980239062867 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263429986177 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.