Some people argue that the government should spend money only on medical care and education but not on theatres or sport stadiums Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people argue that the government should spend money only on medical care and education but not on theatres or sport stadiums. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, whether the governments just need to pay money for consolidating two aspects such as medical care and education or they can also budget for other factors like theatres or sport stadiums has been a topic of discussion. There are both for advocating and against this view, I believe it depends on different reasons.

It is undeniable that the authorities should only care about medical and education. Firstly, this government's activity can ensure that the human's health will always be optimal. To be more specific, medical care is essential to the citizen's healthy life for not only mentality but also physicality, which means the more attaching special importance to medical, the more improved human longevity they can gain, particularly of developing countries. Secondly, the carefulness of the rulings throughout the most focusing on education can help the country's economy to develope rapidly and considerably. In addition, due to the concentration on the field of teaching carefully to the future sprouts of the countries, the markets now can always cultivate and exploit lots of qualified human resources, this will lead to the abundant and high-level labor resources and the speedy development of country's diverse field. For instance, a lot of policies raised by governments about funding budget to students from remote areas and many other resident areas, which ensure to provide the best modern infrastructure to pupils so they can study comfortably without concerning about money. Consequently, focusing on the progress of medical care and education can offer us several benefits for citizen’s advanced life as they always live on the satisfaction about the surety from authorities that the health and educational level is eternally strengthened, resulting in the invisible development on both residents and countries.

However, I am more convinced that apart from financing money to medical treatment and educator's instruction, legislators have to develope roundly other entertaining fields such as theatres and sporty. Initially, the human's demand begins to have the inclination to amused respects after two mentioned sectors are growed fully. In other words, residents become be interested in other problems relating to activities which are able to rise their happiness, particularly of musics or sports, this human's necessity will require their government to pay more investment to expand the magnitude of recreational realm. Next, enhancing the citizen’s enjoyment level through the amusing action can relieve them from stress after the daily rat race. particularly, people who are keen on listening the opera or indulging sports always have the more creative and easy-to-please brain than others, they also have the big enthusiasm about their life, their jobs and surrounding objects, so they can effortlessly find out the best way to relax themselves via those entertaining activities. For example, watching a football match after every working day are favorite hobby of some people, which can supply them more energy for the following new day. As a result, the all-round evolution from basic sectors like medical and education to service sectors can satisfy the life's demand and bring out the artistic pleasure to everyone, simultaneously elevating the premium enjoyment life of a country.

In conclusion, while reasons can be given to justify that should or should not the executives pay more attention on other branches influencing directly to divert, I believe this is not an accurate statement under any circumstance.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-25 thaohienpt008 73 view
2021-06-18 phuchannn 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en a topic of discussion. There are both for advocating and against this view, I ...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ut medical and education. Firstly, this governments activity can ensure that the humans hea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...overnments activity can ensure that the humans health will always be optimal. To be mo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... particularly of musics or sports, this humans necessity will require their government...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 739, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Particularly
...m from stress after the daily rat race. particularly, people who are keen on listening the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3011.0 1615.20841683 186% => OK
No of words: 550.0 315.596192385 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47454545455 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94873498581 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 303.0 176.041082164 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550909090909 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 953.1 506.74238477 188% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.7287183104 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.117647059 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3529411765 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6470588235 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166869586993 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596728527494 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613121289166 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107103493988 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463735929755 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 175.0 78.4519038076 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.