Some people argue that we should do research into our family history. Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that whether history or the present and future should be concentrated on is a subject of debate. While reasons can be given to justify the latter, the former is much more preferable.
On the one hand, there are compelling reasons to think that the present and future development plays a more vital role in the community. The first prominent justification is that society is undergoing a dramatic change, including technology development which emerges as the fourth industrial revolution. It is acknowledged that the concentration on technology help each nation not only immediately accelerate its comparative advantage compared to other countries but also improve the living standards of residents. Furthermore, besides technology development, there is a range of current environmental issues requiring the urgent concern of researchers rather than history. As a matter of fact, people are facing major environmental issues, including climate change, pollution, environmental degradation, and resource depletion. Also, the environment is one of the chief pillars in sustainable development which is the current orientation of developed countries, and thus, obviously needs more attention from the academic world than history.
On the other hand, others would argue that history plays a pivotal role in research. Firstly, it is obvious that without history, human beings would fail to have insights into the operations of people and societies. Given the fact that history is regarded as a storehouse of information about how people and societies behave, we might use history as our laboratory of human experience which is hard to be conducted in the real world. For instance, mass elections, missionary activities, and military alliances are major aspects of society’s operation which cannot be set up as precise experiments. Secondly, history also contributes to moral understanding. This means that it is likely to help people test their moral sense and weather adversity by studying the stories of individuals and situations in the past. These lessons came from not only the great historical men but also the courage, diligence, and protest of ordinary people in the past.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, although the research on the present and future generations should be conducted significantly, it appears to me that doing research on the past should not be neglected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tieuquynh | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | tieuquynh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | annenguyen0203 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 78
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 78
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills, such as cooperative skills. What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions? 61
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students. Discuss these views. Which view do you agree with? Explain why. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51612903226 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11629989068 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561827956989 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9020811135 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157491712355 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478969551177 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507286044068 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102697054029 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452803825241 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.