some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matter (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
It is acclaimed by some people that if children were permitted to make decision of their every day problems, they could become selfish in the future, whereas I believe teenagers ought to be determined about these matter. In this essay, I will shed light on both sides of the matter and give some reasons to support my view
On the one hand, the likelihood of children become selfish as they are allowed to make their own decisions daily is inevitable. Given the freedom to choose, some children may seize this opportunity to opt for whatever they think of, regardless of outer factors such as prices or the feeling of other people. Accordingly, they will gradually ignore the constructive advises from the others, which is an interference to cooperation at schools and at work.
On the other hand, the permission of making decisions that affect the children’s life benefits them in the long run. As children taking the initiative from the most trivial things, it can be an invaluable opportunity for them to learn to tackle with their own problems, thereby training them to become a decisive and responsible person. Hence, this ability will be the basis for teenagers to lead an independent life. To illustrate, when facing the choice between their favourite high-end clothing brand versus the less prohibitive one, children will have to do the cost-effect analysis on their own in order to make the most suitable decision, which is tantamount to the choices of schools or career path when they grow up.
In a nutshell, this method of children’s upbringing can make teenagers become more mature, yet they may find it hard to integrate in team work because of their unwillingness to take other people’s opinions into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-25 | kxngox | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | harnoor123 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | harnoor123 | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | harnoor123 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | sheep | 73 | view |
- some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matter such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 80
- the diagram shows the manufacturing process from making sugar from sugar cane summarise the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contributions to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management ef 89
- Increasingly people eat food from other parts of the world rather than local food What do you think is driving this trend Is this a good or bad development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned about these matter. In this essay, I will shed light on both sides of the mat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, hence, if, may, so, whereas, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98620689655 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73641059147 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4494250949 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.666666667 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2222222222 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262730123258 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101810326155 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687721024241 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156446869697 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277007441208 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.