some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution. However, others argue that there are other ways that are more effective. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, several people claim that there are alternative ways to bring down the excessive rate of air pollution, meanwhile, others believe that traffic-free days are more fruitful. Both of views appear on two arguments, however, which i will explain in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, debaters of using alternative energies to tackle environmental issues related to air quality cite that more and more countries should switch the source of electricity to be changed by environmentally-friendly energy. In fact, there are a few of states which do not apply non-renewable energy to sustainable one such as, electric car and hydropower. Moreover, the official state is better off imposing regulation of the waste limitation or carbon dioxide produced by industrial sector which has bad impacts on society. To exemplify, people could be infected by toxic waste in the long term, leading to respiratory problems.
On the other hand, supporters of this issue highlight that car-free days could help people to pull down the dependence of private vehicles. Generally, this occasion makes people shift to public transportations. For example, using city bus not only reduces traffic congestion issue but also brings individual benefit (saving expense). Furthermore, clean air project motivates society to change their own lifestyle to be healthier. With emphasizing on sports activities, modern society obtains a new habit in their daily life such as, city of Oslo, in Norway, which uses bicycle as main vehicle.
To conclude, in my opinion, traffic-free days have essential role to tackle air quality problem rather than. different ways, including cutting down private transportation and changing society's lifestyle. This is as long as the countries are willing for undertaking the implementation of alternative energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | duchuynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | duyenlf | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | kelvin sandi | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | ieltsstudent | 95 | view |
- Many people believe that living a city life offers greater benefits as compared to the countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years Some believe this is good thing while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 61
- online currencies have become more common in recent years why is this happening is this a positive or negative development 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...appear on two arguments, however, which i will explain in the following paragraph...
^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Different
...tackle air quality problem rather than. different ways, including cutting down private tr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53571428571 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16226959312 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657142857143 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3655135068 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184409112471 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553959084111 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717735101324 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117920098932 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799176019027 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.