Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
People have different views about whether children should be forbidden from using phones during the school day or children can allow using their phones. From my point of view, I completely agree with the former statement due to the following reasons.
On the one hand, there are many reasons explaining why people hold a belief that children do not use their phones in school. However, the most noticeable negative can be children do not focus on lessons in class. This is because when they bring phones to school, they cannot attend to study by notifications or messages from social networks like Instagram, Facebook, and so on. An example is that, in Vietnam, whenever having message sounds, students will take their phones and answer it immediately without attention to the lessons or teachers. As a result, children do not understand lessons in class, which leads to low studying effectiveness.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why some people hold an opinion that children should be banned from using phones in school. The first negative can be clearly seen that children can use their phones for fraud examinations. Because children do not understand the lesson and cannot take tests, so using phones to pass the exam by fraud. To give a clear example, if the test has a question which they do not know, they can use phones to search on the Internet to find the answer. As a result, children still pass the exam but they cannot understand anything that they write.
In conclusion, I believe both sides of the argument have their own reason. However, it seems to me that the first statement is far more significant compared to the second one.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88028169014 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49968258251 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545774647887 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7966126126 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44079843739 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153267038722 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135220145019 0.0667982634062 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26082365439 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103131718224 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.