Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include

Essay topics:

Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Owning a cell phone has become very common for everyone these days, and students are no different. However, some individuals believe that kids should not be allowed to use phones during school hours and that they should be prohibited, while others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones. Everything, in my view, has both positive and negative aspects, but I still believe that youngsters should not use phones.
One of the most significant advantages of utilizing phones is the ability to connect to the internet, which is a valuable source of information. When there are no instructors or parents around to assist, this gadget may assist youngsters with finding information, exercises, images, or other learning-related items. For example, to get a better understanding of chemistry, students may use their phones to watch videos of experiments; many films are uploaded on learning websites; and there are many learning groups to share experiences on social networking platforms such as Facebook, Zalo, and others.
Furthermore, online learning and the use of technology in the classroom are gaining popularity. Online learning at home has grown even more important, especially during the pandemic, and having a phone for kids to study is essential in these times. Parents, for example, cannot allow their children to use their parents' phones to study since incoming messages or calls may disrupt learning; furthermore, parents must use their phones for business or pleasure, thus allowing children to use that phone will have an impact on them. As a result, pupils need a separate phone for studying and the installation of learning apps.
Although there are drawbacks to allowing youngsters to use phones, such as becoming too engrossed in video games, visiting harmful websites, or using their phone for inappropriate reasons. Parents, on the other hand, may fully control their children's phone use by restricting usage time, controlling apps placed on the phone, and explaining the benefits and drawbacks of using the phone to their children. In conclusion, I think that children's phone usage should be limited but not prohibited.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-12 RTroMT 78 view
2023-08-03 ThoiPhong 84 view
2023-07-09 tieuquynh 84 view
2023-06-19 quang0612@1 61 view
2023-05-17 chesse 61 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31578947368 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85393897664 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549707602339 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8172114682 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.846153846 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450613054293 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16065381546 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130322117026 0.0667982634062 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294241096386 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148585510248 0.056905535591 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.