Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty
, others think that
crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
A school of thought holds the idea that social issue and poverty are to blame for criminal while the others believe that it is the outcome of bad individual’s natural instinct. This essay attempts to shed light on the both perspectives before concluding that I am in favor of the later notion.
On the one hand, it is understandable that why the increasing of criminal rate is the outcome of society’s vice. First and foremost, poverty or lack of resources could compel humans to break the law to survive. This could be explained by the fact that in economically disadvantageous communities, people have to face with the limitation of stable employment or upward mobility. Therefore, the absence of legitimate means to achieve financially stability have given rise to the illegal activities as a mean of survival. Furthermore, people whose environment is widespread with social issues may be adapted to the illegal behaviors. For instance, a child who grow up in a neighborhood with drug problems could turn into a drug dealer himself, since he has witnessed drug abuse and addictive as a norm. Therefore, this could act as an urge for people to engage in criminal activities later on.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reason as to why I am convinced that making crime is steam from bad natural human instinct. Proponents of this belief claim that certain traits, such as impulsivity, aggression and callousness predispose individual to immoral or unethical behaviors. This is because people with these traits become less considerate when they perceive any threat, and leading them to likely ignore the consequences of their actions. Another justification is that carrying undiagnosed psychological disorders, and their condition makes individuals more prone to committing criminal. A large share of prison population, especially repeated offenders, are affected by sociopathy, that is characterized as inhibited compassion towards others. This is not well-understood otherwise, and education only partially help mitigating the sociopathy’s effect. For these reasons, criminal nature is definitely worth looking as the cause of their offenses.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that socioeconomic issues are one of the components of people to break the law, I would contend that criminal instinct is a more indicative factor of whether individuals are likely to commit crime.
- When choosing a job salary is the most important decision To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 84
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage 89
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
... on. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reason as to why I am con...
^^^^
Line 5, column 845, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to mitigate' or 'mitigate'.
Suggestion: to mitigate; mitigate
...wise, and education only partially help mitigating the sociopathy’s effect. For these reas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ooking as the cause of their offenses. In conclusion, while it is irrefutable t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36052631579 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16443511302 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586842105263 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5914505869 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.823529412 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126619015 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362577219659 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470267963394 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829442842545 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349226960629 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.