Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, there is a contentious controversy regarding whether it is superior for governments to allocate their budgets to paying full course fees for pupils having desire to attend tertiary education. Although a school of thoughts acknowledges that this policy would have numerous merits, I would align myself with the opinion that this practice is riddled with a lot of pitfalls.
On the one hand, a plethora of factors has prevailed some experts on supporting the former notion. Firstly, this policy could be an incentive motivating students to pursue higher education. For example, Vietnamese authorities have abolished full course fees for some groups of pupils like those being disabled or deficient in money. Accordingly, it is observed that the number of attendants in universities and academic institutions throughout Vietnam has undergone an unprecedentedly substantial increase. Furthermore, if free-of-charge college policy is implemented, this can help to mitigate the financial burdens that a great number of Vietnamese families have to experience. This could be exemplified by the fact that but for the help of authorities in terms of education, a vast array of impoverished Vietnamese people would be insufficient in money to make ends meet because they need to pay for tertiary courses of their children. Ultimately, they would have to work very industriously, which renders them more susceptible to some psychological illnesses such as stress or depression.
On the other hand, there are a host of justifications convincing me to concede that this policy might be unfavorable to some extent. The first reason stems from the fact that if governments spare too much money on education, there will be a lack of money used for investing into other fundamental fields. To illustrate, Lao’s authories are inclined to place more emphasis on education rather than healthcare or economy. According, its economy cannot achieve remarkable success and thrive strongly. Moreover, this practice can encourage governments to impose more taxes. This is because they need to accumulate enough money to devote for deploying this policy. It may lead to the fact that many people in society have to experience a huge pressure relating to financial issues.
In conclusion, explicitly, it is indisputable that the exemption of full course fees might bring plenty of benefits which can accelerate the development of education systems ; nevertheless, I want to affirm that this practice could exert a large number of ominous repercussions on society. Therefore, it is much better for governments to have appropriate allocations for education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g whether it is superior for governments to allocate their budgets to paying full...
^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...ession. On the other hand, there are a host of justifications convincing me to conc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...o affirm that this practice could exert a large number of ominous repercussions on society. There...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47188264059 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14776296117 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562347188264 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3504188883 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244407754322 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071198212641 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516988193549 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158016614426 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311360836202 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.