Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many hold a belief that the policy allowing police to carry guns in execution of justice is accompanied by the upsurge of violent crimes in real life. However, in my opinion, this pessimism is ungrounded.
Firstly, it is noteworthy that police officers are responsible for deterring the latent criminals and taking care of all the citizens’ safety, which could be largely guaranteed by gun-carrying action. Many behavioral studies have shown that although it is invisible, some people who intend to commit a crime are inclined to quit taking action if they are
aware of the serious consequence of meeting gun-carrying police. Therefore, it will be a mistake to overlook the fact that guns are one of effective tools that the police can use to maintain social order and social safety as it is the best deterrent to potential lawbreakers and scare off the
would-be criminals.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this is that police officers taking guns on duty would inevitably raise the level of violent crimes, because this
policy may add fuel to the fire of gun culture. On the ground of democracy and individual freedom, people ask for legalization of private gun ownership for defense or
recreational purposes. This justification is reasonable to some degree; yet, it is incomplete, what they fail to take into account is the fact that publicly traded gun and
ammunition could be reduced by various regulations, typically ending legal immunity for gun manufacturers, investing in smart gun technology, making open gun carriage in puclic places illegal.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that there are more benefits than problems regarding gun-carrying police for reasons mentioned above.
- A lot of young people do not know how to manage their money when graduating from high school What do you think are the reasons What can be done to teach them this important skill 89
- The table shows the change in the number of cinemas in different regions in a European country between 2004 and 2009 89
- Some people say that family has the most powerful influence on a child s development however others say that influences outside the family play a bigger role on children Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
Many hold a belief that the policy allowing polic...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9752566387 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614545454545 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.4942451069 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.111111111 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5555555556 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4444444444 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220406236219 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865729437717 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358174264203 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962166478098 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169263563726 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.