Some people believe that the Internet has brought people closer together by making the world smaller. Others disagree, claiming that the Internet has made people and communities more isolated because they no longer need to leave home and interact with others. Discuss both views.
The Internet, nowadays, has greatly impacted our lives, especially in the way of interacting with others. While some individuals believe that the Internet has shrunk the world smaller and made others interact with each other more simply and effectively, others counter that people in societies are led to become more disengage due to the trend of using Internet platforms to have an interaction instead of going outside. Both views have their own merits, as this essay will demonstrate how the Internet creates a connection between people all over the world and how it affects relationships in real life have become isolated when people do not leave home to meet each other.
To begin with, the Internet is becoming a means for individuals to interact with not only people in their origin country but also in any region of the world is certainly a positive development. Businesses can communicate with customers or people who first be known about their corporation more conveniently and rapidly because they can express their feelings, thoughts, or useful information just by the click of a button. Hence, people are now more cognizant of others' struggles and able to help them. For example, when a crisis occurs, such as an earthquake or terrorist attack, the government can send financial and emotional aid through e-transfers. This action is sped up and at no risk; as a result, people can have a feeling sense of accomplishment and philanthropy for others. Clearly, the Internet is a beneficial tool for making people become closer together in modern days.
That being said just only by using smart electronic devices with a click of a button is actually simple and does not waste time. Of course, it is undeniable that financial and emotional support is profitable, but this action is gradually creating a distance between other people since they do not go outside to meet each other due to the waste of minimal effort. Meeting face-by-face regularly requires a person's time, and energy, also someone needs to have motivation. The fewer people engage in sorts of meetings, the fewer people incline to do so. Therefore, the gap between individuals becomes larger and results in a withdrawal from others' comfort zone can be ignored because of performing things online.
To summarize, the Internet provides people with many benefits, especially bonding people closer together via online platforms, but it also has the power to adversely impact others by causing them to have less time to spend with their family or acquainted members in actual life. However, it is vital that everyone should balance his or her levels or modes of engagement in socialization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 811, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y for others. Clearly, the Internet is a beneficial tool for making people become...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, of course, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2230.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09132420091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74566707445 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559360730594 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.5148422307 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.375 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44063553009 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132335108524 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100452592755 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262483731899 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897764777175 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.