Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
According to some, it is held that the most appropriate way to deal with an unfavourable circumstance like poor work satisfaction or a lack of funds is choosing to live with it. Others, however, believe that exploring varying means to make one's living condition better is more desirable. It seems to me that people should infact improve their lives rather than accepting to live with the status quo.
Many people support coping with a displeasing situation for different reasons. Firstly, they promote the idea that life is predetermined and everyone gets to have their lot in life and should be content with whatever they get. They point to evidence from religious teachings, for example, bible story of Jacob being predestined to rule over his elder twin Esau. And this, they quote erroneously claiming that no one can change their life conditions except it is God's will. These unfounded doctrines held deeply by some has greatly limited their ability to contest negative occurrences. Finally, is the fact that many people are not brave enough to begin the needed revolution and so resolve to an unsatisfied life of mediocrity because they are afraid to hear 'no' or 'it cannot be done'.
Alternatively, others advocate changing a less- than satisfactory situation to an appealing and more beneficial condition. Research has shown that great achievers only got their big breaks because they stood vehemently opposed to the 'norm' consciously and consistently seeking to alter the prevailing conditions around them. J.k Rawlings after being rejected by 12 publishers was finally published for Harry Potter having outrightly refused to accept the rejection he faced. Typically, there is always a 100% 'no' to things we refuse to change, ask or do. On the other hand, there exists a 50% possibility of getting a better job, education or finance just by seeking change. Everyone has a right to a happy and fulfilling life and people should not be blamed for seeking better living conditions.
Overall, it would appear that overturning unpleasant conditions is the most appropriate course of action as this would enable individuals to lead more meaningful and purposeful lives. Therefore, it would be more logical to thrive on oppositions rather than resigning to chance. This itself would be true happiness and success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
- Many elderly people are no longer looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 89
- Nowadays Artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars Why is this happening Is this a positive or negative development 96
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Buying things on the internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Artificial intelligence will soon replace teachers in the classroom Do you agree with this statement What is an alternative to traditional face to face teaching 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ve that exploring varying means to make ones living condition better is more desirab...
^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...coping with a displeasing situation for many different reasons. Firstly, they promote the idea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 755, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...iocrity because they are afraid to hear no or it cannot be done. Alternatively,...
^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...aced. Typically, there is always a 100% no to things we refuse to change, ask or d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16533333333 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78344311161 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629333333333 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9220879715 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.611111111 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0980374937354 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311405291389 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342762668857 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056308077923 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393772337581 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.