Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Other believed that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is trusted by few peoples that exchanging knowledge within worldwide science, commerce and educational sector should be as much as it is allowable, while other peoples denied this statement by mentioning that, allowing open access to some data is very sensitive. Although spreading out various information may bring some harms for a nation by losing credential and financial benefits, but bound-less flow of data may bring better and broader result which will help to achieve cumulative worldwide development.
It is argued that dispersing lesson learn in the field of scientific, commercial and institutional research with other nation, may also need to compromise national interest in this competitive world. That is because, the output from various fact findings studies by investing local resource and cost have some loyalty benefit for that specific country. By holding patent right any nation can gain enormous financial benefits, which may ruin by unethical business practice using the shared experience. Additionally, in the age of competitive world market every country try to create a unique domestic product market to attract foreign investment and consumers to promote national economy. Considering those aspects it is supported by few peoples that disseminating some information might be too hazardous for the national interest.
On the other hand, global benefits can be achieved by sharing local inventions openly which may foster to attained the global development goals. Due to lack of available modern technology and knowledge, sometime local discovery may not reached to the end of real success which can be solved by open access to information with the developed countries. In addition to this for less developed countries where due to resource constraint they are far away from the benefits of modern research and output, sharing can greatly help for their development. However, obstructing the free flow of information may create isolation from global sharing community which may block the further way to access in universal development process.
To summarize both aspect it can be stated that, despite of some risk factors related to free access to the information, I am with the fever of allowing the entrance to knowledge as much as acceptable. Because this will accelerate universal development process and national advancement as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-10 | Hailie | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | tahmeed1993 | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | tahmeed1993 | 78 | view |
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think m
- Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image. 66
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- You hired a car for a part of your holiday last week However there were several problems with the arrangement Write a letter to the manager of the company In your letter mention the details of the hiring explain the problems that you have had and request 87
- Some believe that people should not continue to work once they reach the age of retirement. Do you agree or disagree? Give examples and provide explanation. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47683923706 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87257566174 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566757493188 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3970786394 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.615384615 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183200726746 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668655831947 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454290664058 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10887350613 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251718939702 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.