Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life. Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals, companies, and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some humans accredit that no one should do the equal work for all their employments life. Others justify that doing the equal employments fetch advantages for personal, corporations, passage. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of should do the same jobs for all their working life. First, when you working many jobs will make you tired, hard to have a day off with family. This result should work same jobs, presumably not only to increase the overall trial rate of inexperienced people but also to mitigate their feelings of inferiority because they don’t have experience in those jobs compared to others. This help them experience. Second, working same jobs would probably result in high in come for he company because they know the job well and they will be good working. Which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technology development in any nations.
Neve, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once should do the same jobs. First, almost everyone who doesn’t do the same jobs usually has two jobs. Working two jobs will open up many opportunities. At the same time, when you working many jobs you will be have good economic and have an abundance of ability to meet financial needs. Second, when doing many jobs, you can change your new self. Meet many people, problems solve. This makes you feel very interesting and not boring. By doing two jobs, you will have a lot of knowledge and experience. It, instead it would be far more financially viable option if resources were focused on supporting these who are economically disadvantaged and need more jobs to sustain the economy.
I was discuss both view including advantages and disadvantages. In my opinion, should doing many jobs bring many benefits for individual, society, companies.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-19 hien3112 67 view
2022-09-09 Charles Le 61 view
2022-08-08 Master Panda 73 view
2022-05-18 cynnie.chan 73 view
2022-03-01 Trần Ánh Vy 84 view
Essays by user Trần Ánh Vy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 517, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for the company'?
Suggestion: for the company
...s would probably result in high in come for he company because they know the job well and they...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 524, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'companies'.
Suggestion: companies
... probably result in high in come for he company because they know the job well and they...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...job well and they will be good working. Which benefits society in the long run. In fa...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'discussed'.
Suggestion: discussed
...ore jobs to sustain the economy. I was discuss both view including advantages and disa...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05722891566 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67441894498 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6580282647 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9523809524 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8095238095 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95238095238 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405337387161 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118189671569 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118965997959 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26621787497 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604337066928 0.056905535591 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.