Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read whereas others believe only printed material should be used. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Literacy is inextricably interwoven with one’s capability of learning and pursuing their educational journey in the future. As the world is becoming more digitally integrated, stances are indicating that children’s reading ability can be acquired by utilizing technological advancements. However, some people are still partial to the traditional medium of learning which is using printed books and other materials. In this essay, both opinions will be elucidated before drawing any further conclusion.
On the one hand, electronic books and digital learning materials hold a raft of benefits for preschoolers. One of the major advantages of studying online is that it can be interactive. To specify, since technological devices are integrated into this method of learning, children could utilize different applications with different functions to serve their learning purposes. For example, there has been a host of applications dedicated to teaching preschoolers how to learn the alphabet by using audio files and illustrative images. This might stimulate or enhance the imagination and multitasking skills of young learners, helping them to learn how to read faster. Furthermore, parental guidance and the use of applications like YouTube may stem the root for a new healthy online friendship, which can act as a unique learning motivation for offspring.
On the other hand, printed materials also have prominent upsides that online-based learning may lack. First of all, it has lower possibilities of damaging youngsters’ visions. It is undeniable that using technological gadgets might result in eyestrains or even poorer eyesights of children, therefore, one way to assuage the concern of parents in this regard is to use books and printed materials. What is more, it could be exemplified that in the past, notwithstanding the lack of state-of-the-art laptops or multifunction smartphones, many prominent figures of the era still managed to absorb a reservoir of knowledge through books and paper-based materials. By shedding light on this example, it is crystal clear that offline learning can be advantageous for children.
In conclusion, albeit digital interaction could be beneficial for the development of preschoolers’ literacy with different sources of learning, I am of the opinion that the positive facets of paper materials have eclipsed those of online learning. All things considered, it could be anticipated that the traditional way of learning will keep flourishing in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | hannahbui | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | MAHIR VHORA | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-08 | JennySmith | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-08 | JennySmith | 61 | view |
| 2020-06-15 | sheetal340 | 78 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answe 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- Many parents today organize extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, first of all, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65171503958 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28272274402 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564643799472 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2221865108 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254875330304 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809225502249 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438044016766 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161094870328 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244961094693 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.