Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Every individual has the right to make their own decisions in today's world. A part of society believes that people with professional degrees, such as doctors and engineers, should serve their home country where they received their education, while others disagree and think that each person should have the freedom to make their own choices and select where they would like to chase their career. Although each component has its own importance, I tend to lean toward the later perspective.
Initially, there are numerous reasons many people think it likely that highly trained people should be compelled to work in the nation where they received their education. Firstly, the primary reason leads to this thought is that they are expected to benefit it in exchange for the funding they receive from the government of that country. In other words, students studying as doctors and engineers usually funded by the government in many nations. In order to receive government funding after receiving their degree, individuals should practice in their country. Secondly, they ought to help their nation prosper. In short, there aren't enough capable inhabitants in abundant developing countries to help their countries develop.
On the other hand, the fact that everyone has the ability to choose where they will work is one of the most compelling arguments for why people believe highly skilled people should be allowed to work anywhere they choose. That is to say, the right to choose the country in which one would like to live and work is crucial. Additionally, wealthy nations offer them a better work-life balance and career chances. To give an example, my cousin spent five years in university to study about the nuclear power which didn’t develop much well in Viet Nam. So he decided to travel to Japan where were focus on using the nuclear power as the main source of energy in the future and worked there. In short, working in Japan would give him more progress in career than it would in Viet Nam.
In conclusion, there are many reasons why people think that people with advanced training should work in their country, but I relatively oppose with this idea and believe that people should be free to work wherever they want.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-03 | awu212 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-28 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-26 | 123456abcxyz | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-14 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-14 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...p their nation prosper. In short, there arent enough capable inhabitants in abundant ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, in short, such as, in other words, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37035528806 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533512064343 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8744158853 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5625 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441071664952 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128037606977 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115059437541 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278232198641 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335340877418 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.