Some people believe that school should teach foreign language for primary school children. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on the opinion that kids need to learn other languages for primary school by teachers. From my perspective, this trend has more benefits than restrictions.
First of all, it is undeniable that children can have a better life without worrying about financial problems in the future. This is probably because they can have more opportunities to find an appropriate job with a high salary based on their understanding and knowledge about languages. In fact, they can make their decisions about the salary of the occupation through speaking English masterfully, so they can purchase essential things which are significant to their lives. Take my sister as an example, she had a suitable job with a low income and she tried her best to study English better about 2 years, and then she can decide her own salary through having tests related to English, and now she is working as a clerk at Techcombank with a huge amount of money - about twenty- two million each month.
Secondly, studying other languages better can help children expand their relationships everywhere in the world. To be more specific, kids can communicate with foreigners from every country because they have basic knowledge about English, and it is the most widespread language in the world. In fact, when children can meet people from other countries, they can have a useful conversation with them, and then they can get acquainted with others. For instance, because my sister is extremely skilled at learning English, she expands her relationships through having chats or discussions with foreigners in Vietnam.
To conclude, due to numerous mentioned reasons above, it is my belief that this trend has more positive than negative ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-17 | amanax | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-26 | minh phương phạm hồng | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | TROLLFACENOOB | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Tran Bi | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life 78
- Some people believe that school should teach foreign language for primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- the graphs give information about TV shows screened in HN and HCM City from 1976 to 2006 67
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09246575342 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76566360086 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565068493151 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7043436354 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.181818182 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099127884904 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479548700761 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046842331073 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735847323257 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056789832917 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09246575342 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76566360086 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565068493151 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7043436354 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.181818182 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099127884904 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479548700761 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046842331073 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735847323257 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056789832917 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.