Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstance of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when declining on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Through all these years, having strict and fixed punishments for each type of crime, has been a debating issue between individuals. While some people have wanted to exert certain ones for every criminal, others have desired to consider the stimulation for committing it in order to reduce on the punishment. I myself have concurred with humans whom have believed the offenders’ conditions have to be taken into account.
First of all, many countries have regarded several fixed retributions. During these years, some people have believed applying these punishments should be equal for every criminal no matter how and why they have committed a crime. In their opinion, existence of fixed punishments not only has been like a deterrent for people to commit a crime because they have known of its consequences, but also have helped governments to decide immediately. Furthermore, it may have propelled to decline crime rate. Moreover, they have thought of all criminals same as each other because they have judged them based on their horrible acts. As a result, there would be few possibilities for criminals to alter judge’s opinion in order to decline their punishment.
On the other hand, although other people have been fond of fixed punishments, they have also wanted to discuss how criminals have led to commit a crime. Indeed, thinking about individual crime and the criminals whom have been affected by other’s motivation to do an illegal task, has been a significant diversity which should be considered. In addition, comparing one serial killer who have committed a crime without any encouragement and a murderer who has killed someone in self-defense has been totally unjustified. So because of that reason, in their opinion, based on how offenders have committed a crime, the intensity of their retribution could either be heighten or declined. Therefore, if a criminal committed a crime under horrible situations, it would be extremely unfair to punish them in the same way of other ones.
In conclusion, albeit having these fixed punishments have had several benefits for not only society but also the governments, there are some human-beings who are against it. This group of individuals, which I have agreed with, has always been aware of how horrible situations would lead people to do an illegal thing. Because of that reason, difference between them should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-16 | sinanarimani | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | sinanarimani | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | panizzf | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In some countries the average worker is obliged to retire at the age of 50 while in others people can work until they are 65 or 70 Meanwhile we see some politician enjoying power well into their eighties Clearly there is little agreement on an appropriate 73
- countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- some people think that foreign visitors should be charged more than locals when they visit cultural and tourist attractions in a country To what extend do you agree with this view 87
- When cars and cyclists use the same roads there are often problems Why is this case What are the solutions 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22739018088 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8502006499 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0888005059 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330066333239 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128427571152 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641613785086 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234180976155 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232072816025 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.