Some people believe that watching television is bad for children in every way. Others, however, say that television is good for children to develop as they grow up. Discuss both views and give opinion.
It is true that while some people argue that it is completely harmful for small children to watch television, others believe that watching television might benefit the development of a child. This essay will shed light on both view before concluding that television might have adverse bearings on children and their development.
On one hand, watching television could be advantageous to the development of young children. Firstly, it could provide a wide range of information about numerous educational topics such as wild life, environmental problems, and positive social activities. Those pieces of interesting information might reinforce the knowledge that children learn from the textbooks at schools, which then give them incentives to study and develop themselves. Secondly, watching TV could encourage the young age group to be creative. TV shows that teach DIY, for instance, provide incentives for children to create hand-made crafts by themselves, which then boost their creativity.
On the other hand, television could bring back detrimental effects on a child’s mind and physic. Watching TV intensively could prevent children from reading books, or learning and doing their homework. As a result, their mind would be unable to fully develop and their knowledge would be limited, which is disadvantageous to their future as they would be unqualified in terms of specialized knowledge. Furthermore, young people could have a sedentary lifestyle as they spend most of their time to watch television. Consequently, a higher rate of obesity resulting from a lack of activities can cause health problems, especially heart diseases.
In conclusion, watching television could be beneficial for a child’s development and creativity, however, it also have negative repercussions on the children’ mind and physical statement. Personally, I believe that watching television could be harmful to the young generations, there for parents should limit the time their offspring are allowed to use the TV.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | Vivi_peach | 89 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 67
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these view and give 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...opment and creativity, however, it also have negative repercussions on the children’...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59672131148 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06579993906 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570491803279 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5301600978 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.928571429 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6428571429 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285662839042 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111263390353 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902724879034 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20982351299 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894305084467 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.