Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this not only better for their health but also benefits the world as whole. Discuss both the views and give your pwn opinion.
The agenda is that a host of people do not prefer non vegetables, they think that this is not only way to get healthy lifestyle whereas other say this extremely beneficial. I will discuss both the views in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, in the present era, fewer individuals do not like to eat animals due to the unprecedened reasons. The most obvious problem is that it effects on the health. To clarify, numerous masses are honest to their religion in which they believe that eating someone without any reason is not a good thing. To cite an example, religions such as Brahmins, Sikhism do not recommened meat, fish in their diet due to their religion, they always like to take pure vegetables to live a healthy lifestyle.
Apart from this, opponents say eating meat or fish is directly benefits our health. The pioneer advantage of eating chicken as a diet is help to recover muscle quickly. To elaborate, sometimes at the time of injury the muscles become shrinked which cause lot of pain and problems to body. At that time to overcome with this situation meat is best way. . Hence, sometime chicken play a pivotol role in every person life in some serious situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...me to overcome with this situation meat is best way. For example, the well known sudesh...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... is extremely beneficial to both health as well as to muscles.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, apart from, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72068965517 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58889285809 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8871234322 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5625 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275109143306 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780781317706 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525039068593 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135046491497 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286054204336 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.