Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to make people recycle more is to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Essay topics:

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to make people recycle more is to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

These days, some people argue that not enough amount of home waste is recycled, and they believe that makes recycling a legal requirement increase the recycled waste from home. However, I oppose the view that rules are needed to reuse more of their home waste.

There are a few reasons why not enough amount of home rubbish is recycled. Firstly, many people don't know the advantage of recycling product because of their orthodox mentality. Secondly, resident has no idea about recycling facilities available in their city or area. Thus they throw rubbish into garbage even if they can reuse it with the help of those facilities. Finally, nowadays many home product made from those materials which are difficult to recycle. For example, Plastic, we all know that almost all home waste is plastic waste which is hard to recycle we can burn them only. Thus, it is clear that why people cannot recycle enough amount of home waste.

According to me, make recycling a legal requirement is not a good idea to address this problem. However, the government can apply other measures to increase recycled waste. The government or city council provide facilities in every town that recycle every type of home product and also rewarded them if they recycle more of their home waste. People can reduce the usage of those products which can not recycle and they can use different bin for different type of garbage. At last, the government should encourage people to use those products which are easy to reprocess instead of those products which can't be recycled.

In conclusion, make a law or legal requirement is not the best solution to this problem. However, the government increase recycling facilities, aware people about recycling benefits and reduce the usage of non-recyclable products.

Votes
No votes yet
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-21 sumomoakiko 84 view
2018-10-05 tejaswi0924 73 view
2018-08-08 Vinit panchal view
2018-02-21 Huda Atta 73 view
Essays by user Vinit panchal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...bbish is recycled. Firstly, many people dont know the advantage of recycling product...
^^^^
Line 4, column 270, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...lities available in their city or area. Thus they throw rubbish into garbage even if...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...recycle enough amount of home waste. According to me, make recycling a legal requirement is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 603, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...process instead of those products which cant be recycled. In conclusion, make a l...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05743243243 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49661705006 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483108108108 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1490061083 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5625 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376811121804 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129685455422 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963783788606 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280632964421 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107168452375 0.056905535591 188% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.