Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will no longer be necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree?
There are those who opine that buildings in which objects of historical, scientific, artistic, or cultural interest are stored and exhibited will become redundant as all of the content can be viewed using the Internet. Personally, I totally disagree with this viewpoint because these buildings provide a clear view of objects and they will be constantly existing as reliable sources of information.
First and foremost, I believe the most important is that traditional forms of museums and galleries is an undoubtedly trustworthy source of information. Indeed, we are living in the age of dissenting information which can be spread by anyone, therefore, it is not always suitable to believe in what we see online. For example, the color, which is an essential factor contributing to the success of an artwork can be edited beforehand by many people online. Whereas, public museums and galleries are often run by a group of experienced collectors, professors, and the government, who have supported an enormous effort to keep the information they provided up to date and genuine. As a result, visitors can learn not only vividly but also effectively when visiting these places.
In conjunction with the aforementioned point, we also cannot deny the fact that viewing objects and artworks online might bring incorrect data. In fact, we have not fully pushed back the frontiers of camera technology yet that captured works and remains may have false expouse, contrast, and they do not contain as rich details as real-life version. Consequently, this can cause a serious misunderstanding and confusion for viewers.
In conclusion, I fully espouse the notion that public museums and art galleries will still be important besides their online form by virtue of the genuine information and precise, true looking of objects and artworks.
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 78
- Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important To what do you extent agree or disagree 61
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will no longer be necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 78
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... and exhibited will become redundant as all of the content can be viewed using the Interne...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29794520548 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96886601511 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8900950799 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.636363636 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224553137704 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711323740992 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450678298446 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125034225357 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466654987814 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.