Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will no longer be necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree?
It is said that a computer can enable people to view artifacts and artwork on the Internet, so public museums and art galleries will be regarded as unnecessary. However, I personally believe that the benefits associated with those places including tourism promotion and in-depth understanding of the works of art are more significant.
Firstly, preserving historical museums and art galleries is essential because they are valuable assets to the tourism industry. This is explained by the fact that museums and art galleries are famous tourist attractions and so a great number of tourists going on holiday always put watching the historical and artistic displays on their to-do lists. As a result, the tourism revenue will be increased considerably as people spend their money on trips to these spots.
Secondly, computers are incapable of giving people the experience of being in the presence of the historical objects and masterpieces, which is different from just viewing static pictures and videos of them behind the screen. To be more specific, people can only sense the sacred atmosphere and subsequenly comprehend the genuine historical, cultural and artistic values of the artefacts and works of art when they are observing them in person.
In conclusion, I subscribe to the view that historical museums and art galleries will never become obsolete since without the existence of these culturally and historically significant places, the tourism industry will receive substantial losses and people will find it impossible to fully understand the true values of the historical objects and artistic creations.
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will no longer be necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 56
- Gaming has become a popular e sport and has been included in some regional and international sports events Some people advocate this claiming that there is almost no risk of injury with e sports others are worried tha he increasing popularity of competiti 84
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem while others think effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinio 89
- Some people think that childern should start primary school later in life others thinks that they should start it before 7 Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43650793651 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91732256959 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563492063492 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8710870368 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.25 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387705288975 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16453615306 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719055336956 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232011312722 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253033938759 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.