Some people have benefited from modern communications technology, but some people have not benefited from it at all. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a big controversy surrounding modern communications technology. I completely concur with these assertions that individuals can earn numerous benefits from such technology but some people have not benefited from it and in this essay I will give some examples to support my idea.
For a variety of reasons, it would be true that some people can benefit immensely from modern communications technology. In the Internet era, people need to update more advances to leverage their knowledge. In addition, technological advances also help people to be more straightforward in their life. Taking smartphone invention as an example, an ever-increasing number of people get easier to connect with their relatives who are far away. Moreover, during Covid-19 quarantine, individuals can work together online through technological devices. Besides that, people can catch up on the huge amount of news in order not to leave behind everybody surrounding them.
On the other hand, I also strongly support that it is true when some people have not benefited from it. This means that there are various people who do not have enough money to pay for modern communication technology. They can not earn perks which current technology brings to humans nowadays. Besides that, elder people who are 65 years old and above can not update technological advances as soon as the new generation. They usually struggle remembering complicated things such as how to browse social media platforms or take a photo, even send a normal text message.
In conclusion, I would strongly believe that it is completely true when some people, nowadays, have earned numerous benefits from modern communications technology but there are also many individuals who can not benefit from it at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communications'' or 'communication's'?
Suggestion: communications'; communication's
...is a big controversy surrounding modern communications technology. I completely concur with th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communications'' or 'communication's'?
Suggestion: communications'; communication's
...eople can benefit immensely from modern communications technology. In the Internet era, people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ns nowadays. Besides that, elder people who are 65 years old and above can not update t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to remember'.
Suggestion: to remember
...e new generation. They usually struggle remembering complicated things such as how to brows...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communications'' or 'communication's'?
Suggestion: communications'; communication's
...ve earned numerous benefits from modern communications technology but there are also many indi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28113879004 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00714481236 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562277580071 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7395577466 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436969309783 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148136928611 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138610553022 0.0667982634062 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31729711079 0.151304729494 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077717263844 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.