Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the issue of history education has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that more emphasis should be placed on history as a school subject than science and technology, while others argue otherwise. And I wholeheartedly agree with the latter stand. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that teaching history is more crucial than science and technology do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that pupils can know our ancestors' misbehaviour, preventing people from committing the same mistakes that happened in the past, such as imperialism and colonisation. Furthermore, human beings have to take responsibility for bequeathing our history to future generations considering that learning history makes it possible for them not only to feel a sense of belonging to society but also to have patriotism.
My opinion, however, is that youngsters benefit a lot more from being educated about science and technology. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that science graduates are more likely to find well-paying and prestigious employment opportunities in the job market with greater ease considering that these people are more in demand in this technologically-advanced era. Another convincing reason is that having deeper understandings of huge amounts of knowledge related to these enables mankind to devise a multitude of groundbreaking solutions to contemporary problems that humans face. As an illustration, people who have a tight grasp of science and technology can lessen the impact of climate change and save numerous people suffering from global hunger. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that studying science and technology should be prioritised for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-16 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | sahil nain | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | englishessays | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | shalin63 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- Some people think they have the right to use as much freshwater as they want, while others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater as it is a limited resource. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Q4 Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both views and give your opini 84
- Q4 Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both views and give your opini 92
- Q3 Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree with this statement 89
- Q4 Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both views and give your opini 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that studying...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44303797468 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1643544239 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3526447807 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.857142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311535837519 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964984705317 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752419811815 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174766533901 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793139271123 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.