Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Whilst some people claim that schools should mostly focus on History as it is essential to learn from the past and be aware of our national identity, others argue that subjects such as science or technology are more practical for our contemporary world. In my opinion, all these areas of study are as an equal importance since society requires them all.
On the one hand, there is a conventional belief that History is the most significant subject at the school, and all students should concentrate on it. This is because it has always been vital for communities to learn from their past, and try to make their ancestors' experiences work at the present time. In this way, people will find their way through a developed society much easier. For instance, different nations can learn from previous revolutions to avoid their errors in a similar situation at present. In addition, nurturing students who are knowledgeable about their past is a kind of support for a country's culture. In fact, it helps a nation to preserve their cultural traditions and pass them to the next generation. To illustrate, the students who are not aware of their history, may easily be lured by the features of another culture, and lose their own national identity.
On the other hand, some persuade the pupils to focus carefully on other subjects rather than history, such as Science or Technology. The reason for this is that they believe these studies are more practical in our modern world, and they are the only way of understanding it. This can stem from the fact that post-modern communities are so appealed by the technology that nothing else can explain our attitudes and help people to improve their quality of life. For example, when choosing a major of profession, parents generally encourage their children to go for Science and technology to have better job opportunities.
From my point of view, each society needs all sorts of professions and experts to make progress. In other words, lacking a certain study at schools is like ignoring a part of society's need. For instance, without experts in history a community will not be able to discover new stuff from the past.
In conclusion, although Technology and Science have become more practical in our times, other subjects are still required for a society to grow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-16 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | sahil nain | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | englishessays | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | shalin63 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- Human beings do not need to eat meat in order to maintain good health because they can get all their food needs from meatless products and meatless substitutes A vegetation diet is as healthy as a diet containing meat Argue for or against the opinion abov 61
- Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages therefore it is a waste of time to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages therefore it is a waste of time to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- some people believe that nature is more important than nurture to what extent do you agree 56
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9358974359 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68399326664 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7013768333 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.235294118 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222536879588 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699855512955 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721530690756 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142128242179 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774258264863 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.