Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems, do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays environmental issues are of great concern to the public. Many strategies to curb the cause phenomenon that are introduced. Whether boosting price of fuel could alliviate impacts upon the environment, is a controversial issue. I partly agree with this viewpoint as there are other factors that contribute to deterioration of ecosystems.
Apart from fuel, other elements such as industrialization and urbanisation are associated with degradation of nature. First, overpopulation in major cities requires constant expansion of human's living habitat, which narrows living areas of flora and fauna. Given that wild animal and vegetation lose their natural habitat, balance of biordiversity is placed at risk. Likewise, it is mandatory for human beings to ramp up manufacture in order to meet ever increasing food, shelter, and other commodities demand. By doing so, companies leave enormous amount of carbon footprint in forms of chemical waste, emission that are main culprit of pollution to land, water bodies and air. Finally, shifts in people's lifestyle also have detrimental impacts upon the nature. Ways of life, which encourage convenience, instant gratification that favor plastic usage, fast fashions, and so forth exert a huge burden on environment. Thus, other components should be taken into account to address environment problems.
Admittedly, it is undeniable that changing fuel charge more or less influences evironment. If fuel price is increased, people tend to change to other types of vehicle or utilizing public transit. For instance, electric vehicle's operational price is much more affordable these days, which makes utilization of electric cars become more common. In addition to this, rise in fuel expenditure also motivates commuters to deploy public transportation system, therefore curb personal vehicles's emission, which causes environmental impacts. However, electric vehicles availability is yet rare and relevant public facilities are not adequate at the moment, therefore solely depending on fuel charge seem not sufficiently solving issues in environment.
In sum, human's activities are raised along with dire consequences on our planet. I believe that integrated approaches should be applied rather than just only changing fuel cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | kokomongcutee | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays most people try to balance between work and other parts of their lives Unfortunately not many achieve this balance What are the problems with this Suggest some solutions to solve the problems 84
- The cost of flying has decreased significantly over the last decades This has made oversea travel much more accessible Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 67
- Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy with everything organised and in the correct place What is your opinion about this 11
- News coverage about violent crimes frightens people and encourages criminals Therefore some believe that this type of news should not be reported in newspapers or shown on TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is often argued that it is difficult to get children to read Why do you think this is What measures could be taken to encourage children to read more Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun influences is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...iable that changing fuel charge more or less influences evironment. If fuel price is...
^^^^
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...nvironmental impacts. However, electric vehicles availability is yet rare and relevant p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther than just only changing fuel cost.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74556213018 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05314549597 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686390532544 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9293697751 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.210526316 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150949258627 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401794840951 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360245522078 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861850141552 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278380710593 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.