Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems, do you agree or disagree?
Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems, do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays environmental issues are of great concern to the public. Many strategies to curb the cause phenomenon that are introduced. Whether boosting price of fuel could alliviate impacts upon the environment, is a controversial issue. I partly agree with this viewpoint as there are other factors that contribute to deterioration of ecosystems.
Apart from fuel, other elements such as industrialization and urbanisation are associated with degradation of nature. First, overpopulation in major cities requires constant expansion of human's living habitat, which narrows living areas of flora and fauna. Given that wild animal and vegetation lose their natural habitat, balance of biordiversity is placed at risk. Likewise, it is mandatory for human beings to ramp up manufacture in order to meet ever increasing food, shelter, and other commodities demand. By doing so, companies leave enormous amount of carbon footprint in forms of chemical waste, emission that are main culprit of pollution to land, water bodies and air. Finally, shifts in people's lifestyle also have detrimental impacts upon the nature. Ways of life, which encourage convenience, instant gratification that favor plastic usage, fast fashions, and so forth exert a huge burden on environment. Thus, other components should be taken into account to address environment problems.
Admittedly, it is undeniable that changing fuel charge would influences evironment. If fuel price is increased, people may select other types of vehicle or utilize public transit. For instance, electric vehicles' operational price is much more affordable these days, which makes electric cars become more common. In addition to this, rise in fuel expenditure also motivates commuters to deploy public transportation system, therefore curb personal vehicles's emission, which causes environmental impacts. However, electric vehicles availability is yet rare and relevant public facilities are not currenlty adequate, thereby solely depending on fuel charge seems not sufficiently solving environmental issues.
In sum, fuel consumption and rasing human's activities cause dire consequences. believe that integrated approaches should be applied rather than just only changing fuel cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | kokomongcutee | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organization rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 67
- As transport and accommodation problems are increasing in many cities governments are encouraging businesses to move to rural areas Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Widespread of technology has given people more freedom to work instead of travelling to work or college Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 89
- Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve the sales of products that people do not really need To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'influence'
Suggestion: influence
...eniable that changing fuel charge would influences evironment. If fuel price is increased,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...nvironmental impacts. However, electric vehicles availability is yet rare and relevant p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 79, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Believe
...ans activities cause dire consequences. believe that integrated approaches should be ap...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther than just only changing fuel cost.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8567251462 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04873746155 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698830409357 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5459141804 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.15 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295904901558 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841647004961 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183024589332 0.0667982634062 274% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249791167279 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.309852992792 0.056905535591 545% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.41 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.