Some people say that it is more important to spend money on improving roads and motorways than public transport.
There is no denying that transport is one of the most important aspects of most nations. In light of this, which area of transport is more crucial to receive a higher amount of invested money has become a topic of general interest among citizens. Although some people believe spending money on upgrading public transport is more necessary, I would argue that roads and highways should have that privilege.
Some people give a reason why spending funds on improving public transport is more important. An advocate for this opinion might argue that this investment would contribute to addressing environmental problems such as air pollution. Since public means reduce the number of vehicles running on the roads, it would lower the amount of carbon dioxide - which is released by vehicles into the environment. However, car manufacturing companies now tend to convert fossil fuel vehicles into electric cars and aim at a complete replacement in the future so the environmental issue would no longer be a concern. Besides, public transport degrades faster, so a significant amount of constant money is required for the investment.
In my opinion, improving roads and motorways is more vital that the government should spend more money on. This is because the number of accidents would be decreased and enhanced. It is a fact that poor transport infrastructure highly associates with traffic accidents and results in casualties and loss of humans and property. Therefore, upgrading roads is constantly needed for a healthy society. Moreover, the improved highways will solve the traffic congestion problem since high speeds agree with traffic participants, and separated lanes would help traffic easier. Different from public transport, roads and highways are more durable as they are solid and tough enough to be easily wrecked.
In conclusion, both sides are necessary to be invested for the enhancement. Roads and motorways should receive a greater coffer because it offers citizens more long-term benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-28 | trucvy112233 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 78 | view |
- The diagrams show the structure of a solar panel and its use 78
- Some people believe women are better leaders than men To which extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people try to balance work and other parts of their life However this is very difficult to do What are the problems associated with this What is the best way to achieve a better balance 84
- Large companies use sports events to promote their products Some people think it has a negative impact on sports To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38291139241 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83131419961 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572784810127 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8514800233 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360197775943 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117649373663 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12992876834 0.0667982634062 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209505733589 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847957862782 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.