Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In contemporary society, whether or not the endangered flora and fauna are the two most serious consequences of our worsening environment has become a controversial issue in many parts of the world. It is argued that the loss of wildlife is the most urgent. Nevertheless, I maintain that the impact of other natural disasters outweighs that of non-existed plants and animals for several reasons.
On the one hand, the disappearance of wildlife can entail the lack of natural balance of all creatures on the Earth. This can lead to food shortages in many countries that suffer from the population boom. In addition, the extinction of some plants can have a lot of domino effects on people’s lives. For example, flood and soil erosion have happened and lasted long for many years; as a result, people withstand the failure of crops and cannot ensure a good financial health. Besides, when fauna and flora die, soil can be supplied nutrients to make the high qualities and quantities of agricultural products.
On the other hand, I incline that some disasters which stem from climate change can be more dangerous. Firstly, some countries nowadays, such as Japan or Australia, have to face disasters related to temperature degrees like hurricanes, tsunamis, and blizzards. Many unfortunate people died because of these, however, the lack of foods or nutritious soil can be reduced and rehabilitated without any death. Moreover, the COVID-19 epidemic can result in a high mortality rate all over the world.
To sum up, while the extinction of plants and animals can have some consequences, other disasters are far more dangerous because their consequences are immediate and serious. I suggest that the government should place more importance on protecting-environment awareness than on entertainment or tourist facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 78
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 100
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents 84
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
In contemporary society, whether or not the endangered flora and fauna are the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on entertainment or tourist facilities.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27147766323 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08731857764 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4023410213 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.571428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110443696585 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391184650315 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353177511781 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739258890915 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283673907028 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.