Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, some universities are facing different opinions about substantial alterations in new education. Some people consider that students should study whatever they like.Otherwise, others think that students only need to learn useful subjects related to science or technology. However, I believe intensely that it is better for students to choose favourite subjects.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why people reckon that universities should only offer subjects that will be beneficial in the future. Firstly,schools can look for potential students earlier for scientific fields which make huge prospects to increase the resource of professional labour as well as impulse innovations in developing competition among countries. Secondly, although Science or technology are awkward topics, it facilitates young learners to improve effectively mental powers and thinking ability. Because in some US schools, a few students focusing on this subjects invariably get high score on IQ tests.
On the other hand, I still perceive that when students are able to study something they are passionate, they will spend more time to concentrate on coming up with outstanding ideas at the touch of a button. Therefore, they can enhance themselves capability and gain accomplishments. For example, thanks to university’s acceptance, my best friend leaps at an opportunity to pursue her musical dream , then she really becomes a renowned singer. Additionally, students can have strong inspiration and motivation to research favourite work productively and elaborately, so they completely access in-depth knowledge more quickly. Last but not least, if students are allowed to select favourite subjects, they will enjoy an exhilaration in life and avoid being strain when studying intricate subjects.
In conclusion, both arguments have distinct merits. Notwithstanding, in my mind, studying whatever students love is a superior way which should be given teaching programs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Otherwise
...tudents should study whatever they like.Otherwise, others think that students only need t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students to choose favourite subjects. On the one hand, there are various reaso...
^^
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , schools
...ill be beneficial in the future. Firstly,schools can look for potential students earlier...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 578, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... US schools, a few students focusing on this subjects invariably get high score on I...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...invariably get high score on IQ tests. On the other hand, I still perceive that...
^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... opportunity to pursue her musical dream , then she really becomes a renowned sing...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rain when studying intricate subjects. In conclusion, both arguments have disti...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76712328767 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16608046492 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688356164384 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7627011189 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408167266525 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117733642215 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118800532235 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231071187463 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806795719627 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.