Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that all students entering university should study whatever they are keen on. Nevertheless, other people think that subjects useful in their future exclusively be permitted, take science and technology for examples. In this essay, the arguments surrounding the issue of subjects chosen will be discussed.
On the one hand, learning whatever students prefer in university has many positive aspects. Students feel more into the subjects which they are fond of. That is an excellent influence, impacting and making students actively explore for knowledge. Moreover, students entering third-level education dont feel depressed and tedious due to unwanted subjects during their study times. Since students choose subjects depending on their favourite, they are able to express their strong points more conveniently. If people want to possess a profound understanding of a particular aspect, they should spend time digesting it instead of others.
On the other hand, although it may be true to say that learning what students want is a great choice, it does not necessarily mean that learning useful subjects is not important. Nowadays, Unemployment becomes alarming problem all over the world. In industrial countries, 85% of their population have stable jobs, whereas there are only 40% in developing countries, the rest work part-time or are unemployed. This is why students must learn useful subjects in university. In the technological era, if an individual does not have awareness of science and technology, he can not keep up with world development. Though useful subjects are very necessary, people will feel spiritless when they are solely permitted to learn them. From my point of view, I support that learners should approach whatever they want to improve themselves comprehensively.
To sum up, useful and elective subjects are important for students in their future and their development. Nonetheless, it is pretty fortunate to learn everything that students like in university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...students entering third-level education dont feel depressed and tedious due to unwan...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d time digesting it instead of others. On the other hand, although it may be tr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t work part-time or are unemployed. This is why students must learn useful subjec...
^^
Line 5, column 849, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to improve themselves comprehensively. To sum up, useful and elective subjects ...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing that students like in university.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, third, whereas, for example, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53246753247 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94697903698 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581168831169 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9417390159 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362933117467 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107460464128 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739841783467 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237294729044 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119143801277 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.