Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
It is controversial whether students should be free to follow their hearts or be forced to study practical subjects in the future. I personally support the idea that everyone should be able to study the course of their choice.
On the one hand, universities should only offer key areas of study which is useful in the future because of their social and personal benefits. From a social perspective, focusing on science and technology in higher education can lead to well-educated engineers, doctors, and scientists who create everlasting impacts for our society. Without those, a country may be bounded to progress their society because of the lack of innovative inventions. On a personal level, in today's industrialization market, these courses might provide more career opportunities for students. With a high level in science and technology segments, it is potential for them to obtain a good job with better salaries
On the other hand, it would be better for students to opt for their interests due to their motivations and unpredictable future. Firstly, students are more likely to be motivated when they study the subject of their choice. Striving for areas they are truly curious about could make them more independent and go beyond the required academic material. As a result, their academic outcomes will be improved. Secondly, it is hard to predict exactly the future, specifically, what areas of knowledge will be more helpful. For example, if some employers prefer to hire well soft-skill staff rather than those who are skillful in science or technology, we will need more students of art and philosophy.
In conclusion, concentrating only on science and technology may be a prospect for students’ future. However, it is better for students to have their own right to study the subject they are passionate about.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16835016835 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94133520694 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0239300782 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325788157098 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125047177008 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808889816461 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219071674138 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472042575133 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.