Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
These days, there is a belief that universities should entitle students to design their curriculum without being forced to choose subjects. This has met with strong opposition from others, who assert that students must study subjects based on their future career prospect, especially science-based subjects.
Since globalization and the explosive movement of technology in the 21st century, there has been a growing demand for skilled workers to quench the thirst of the global population, possibly accomplished with prior training closely related to future employment. This explains for the popularity of vocational courses in recent years, as they are adapted to providing learners with necessary skills for their future in the developing world. Developing a solid foundation for a student’s career prospect also secures their employability later on, particularly due to the intense competition in the job markets.
From another perspective, those relishing the idea of the liberating educational system believe that this leads to flexibility in the job-seeking process and chances to pursue personal interests. To illustrate, a student who majors in one discipline may develop a passion for another, such as artistry or technology. Upon his graduation, this student will have already attained a decent set of skills in both disciplines, subsequently adding another job to his list of part-time or full-time employment. This also gives birth to more freedom and opportunities for future pursuit, however in the form of a profession.
There is a decent amount of reason that concludes why I agree on the first ideology presented here. Even though freedom vindicated liberating education, securing a stable position is crucial as the job markets have become perceivably competitive and widespread unemployment has raised concerns in several countries. After all, the future should be protected with a solid profession, rather than by two or three jobs which are probably not as reliable as they seem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, so, after all, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56026058632 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03115421792 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644951140065 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9589454934 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.25 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182701941449 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059534195578 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560136195468 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104541343764 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485933458749 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.